Anti-Piracy legislation in Congress found itself back in the spotlight today as sites like Wikipedia, Reddit, and others shutdown in protest of the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) and Protect IP Act (PIPA). If Congress approves these acts, critics on both sides of the aisle say the US will step toward Chinese government-like censorship of the web. Of course, proponents of the bill say that those criticisms are overblown and that SOPA and PIPA will only serve to bolster the entertainment industry and create jobs. Here’s a look at the over-simplified pros and cons of both SOPA and PIPA:
Pros
- The government is more capable of pursuing copyright violations that occur on the web.
- It gives the government more authority in prosecuting those who produce counterfeit goods and sell them online.
- In theory, it will boost revenues for the entertainment industry, which has suffered greatly from online content theft in recent years.
Like The Dysfunction Junction on Facebook
Cons
- Major websites like Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube will be forced to patrol user content to ensure it doesn’t contain links to pirated content.
- New internet start-ups will be more reluctant to locate in the US when they can choose countries with less restriction.
- Could potentially push jobs overseas when US internet companies relocate to avoid strict regulation.
- The three cons above are important, but the main protest point is that SOPA and PIPA represent the government extending its reach into our lives at a previously unseen level. Basically, it starts the US on a slippery slop of censorship with the question being: if they can control our internet, what can’t they do?
Of course, the pieces of legislation are much more complicated, but that’s them in a nutshell. To me, it seems that the two acts, while well intentioned, won’t solve the real problem of internet piracy while still creating excessive hoops for website owners to jump through to ensure they’re in compliance. Internet piracy is a real problem that drains hundreds of millions of dollars from the entertainment industry, but this form of government meddling is not the solution.
Further Reading
- Pros and Cons of the Keystone Pipeline
- Why is Andrew Sullivan so Dumb?
- The Legacy of Margaret Thatcher
- Governor Haley Barbour Defends 215 Pardons
- A Conservative Look at The Non-Existent War On Christmas
Don’t forget to follow The Dysfunction Junction on Twitter, Like us on Facebook, and sign up for daily e-mail updates for your chance to win one of two $500 Visa Gift Cards. Click HERE to find out more about you can win.
Pingback/Trackback
Pros and Cons of SOPA and PIPA | The Conservative Journal
Nehemiah says:
SOPA isnt out to censor the Internet. Youtube already has an extensive copyright policy, i would know i have had my account deleted. People just need to realize if you didnt create, then it not yours.
People also fail to realize that the owners of the material have to point out that you are indeed ignoring copyright laws b4 anything happens. Meaning its pretty much the same as it always has been only it more defined. Hell if most companies didnt care that you posted a photo of their movie on facebook they probably wont care now. Most of these instances are to small and widespread they wouldn’t care. SOPA is after the big guns, such as websites who are constantly posting pirated movie and film, such as piratebay
I hate how everyone is overreacting to SOPA. SOPA IS NOT INVADING THE INTERNET! THE GOVERNMENT IS NOT CENSORING THE INTERNET!!! If a website you constantly go to is suddenly effected by SOPA its was already illegal anyway, the Law just caught up with Technology!
Kent McCarty says:
Nehemiah, I understand what SOPA and PIPA intend to do, but it’s kind of like using a laser miter saw to cut a piece of paper. It creates too much additional responsibility and liability for website owners who rely on user-generated content to function.
There are plenty of people who are against SOPA only because they don’t want to see pirated content off the web, but that’s not where I take issue. Those people need to realize that, while they may not like no longer being able to watch music videos and listen to music on YouTube, the content is still there illegally. The entertainment industry has every right to ask for that to be taken down, but I can’t accept SOPA or PIPA as the best fixes to that problem.
Thanks for stopping by,
Kent McCarty
dennis says:
Nehemiah you are a fag.
Paul says:
Typical liberal name-calling without the basis of proof.
crystal says:
It is censoring not on the levels in which you are thinking if a little kid can’t sing a song on video and show his family on Facebook then that’s censorship I understand that piracy is getting bad but lets face it there is no need to pay these outrages prices for entertainment 20 dollars to see a movie with a friend 19 dollars to buy a dvd you will watch once then put it on a shelf maybe if there was a limit on how much you can charge for enterainment there wouldnt be a problem im sorry but i always scope out a movie befor i buy it, and the music i dont already have is deffently not worth the money. so basically ppl are going to get pickeier about what they watch and buy and they still wont make money the garbage thats been passing as entertainment isnt worth the money.
Kent McCarty says:
Crystal, the scenario you described isn’t censorship, it’s simply enforcing copyright laws. Piracy is a huge issue that costs the entertainment industry hundreds of millions of dollars every year, so I understand their desire to crack down on the issue. I agree that music and movies are expensive, but that’s the prerogative of the company putting out the product. We don’t have a right to cheap music or movies, so the industry can set whatever price they see fit. The fact that they’re already making a lot of money doesn’t change the fact that downloading or watching pirated content is illegal.
Having said that, I still think neither SOPA nor PIPA is the right soluation.
Thanks for stopping by,
Kent
MIke says:
Okay, so who here supports the US government – the congressional budget office says SOPA will cost the tax payers $47 million to enforce over the next five years – propping up the outdated business models of the RIAA/MPAA? Raise your hands if you want to pay to enforce a private entities supposed rights?
I am a a content provider. I make content. I enforcement my copyrights under the DMCA, (which is another terrible law, but better – by a quantum leap – than SOPA).
Would somebody please put those currs that pirate my content into jail and let me sue them for everything they have?
Would the government PLEASE intrude into my life some more? Pretty please?????
Dario says:
Well, when you say, either the SOPA nor the PIPA are the right solution for the problem, that the entertainment industry is suffering, what would be the right solution?
I agree to the fact, that films have become quite expensive, (but like you’ve said, we can not change that), also to the fact, that the government may not observe our internet. But how else can they prevent “pirates” to upload their stuff respectively support the suffering industry?
I’m following these discussions about that already for a while, but I can’t see any counter-proposals…
Excuse me for my bad english,
Writing to you from switzerland, Dario, 16
Pingback/Trackback
SOPA: An Internet Apocalypse for Americans | kellics121
Pingback/Trackback
ENG 102-A (Crews) - The World of Cyber Crime